Surrealism, is it a way bywhich we can explicitly ablolish the intellectual rigidity or is it simply an anthroprogenically defined way of reconciling the intellectual analysis with unconsciousness ?
Dadaism paved the way for this symbiosis I guess, not by its interepretation but instead by providing the first ingredient of such belief. I am not in favor of rejecting the logic . to me there exists an equilibrium between two stances ,with discrepencies in attributes.this equilibrium could be ascribed to an individual while it is usually applied for a group. I consider the individual level. this oppresive logic, which i felt myself , will separate (shift the equilibrium ). then the diametric conflict shows up . moreover, this conflict is remaining till you get rid of the imposing factor. Again I am not supportig the dadaism, rather I am exploring it. thereafter , the unconscious part can not even play the placebo effect . no effect . not at all . the equilibrium has changed . lets look at this way . even if you use your unconsciousness , it functions as if its is another ramification of hyperacute dosage of rationality. the way out is definitely not tending to Anarchy which itself was defined by unconsious rationality. what do you think ?
Hamed
Dadaism paved the way for this symbiosis I guess, not by its interepretation but instead by providing the first ingredient of such belief. I am not in favor of rejecting the logic . to me there exists an equilibrium between two stances ,with discrepencies in attributes.this equilibrium could be ascribed to an individual while it is usually applied for a group. I consider the individual level. this oppresive logic, which i felt myself , will separate (shift the equilibrium ). then the diametric conflict shows up . moreover, this conflict is remaining till you get rid of the imposing factor. Again I am not supportig the dadaism, rather I am exploring it. thereafter , the unconscious part can not even play the placebo effect . no effect . not at all . the equilibrium has changed . lets look at this way . even if you use your unconsciousness , it functions as if its is another ramification of hyperacute dosage of rationality. the way out is definitely not tending to Anarchy which itself was defined by unconsious rationality. what do you think ?
Hamed
