hsppiness !!

I was asked to describe it, not to use the references :
Frankly, I'm almost passing a transition phase where I'm not in touch with what I feel about so called "internal perception ", rather I'm exploring the defined routes of happiness. Happiness to me is like a puzzle : changing according to time and space . what satisfies me at this moment is not adequate to fulfill my further definition of happiness. but lets get it straight " at this moment of time and space , happiness is the Freedom to me " , being free of any arbitrarily accepted format. Spontaneously derived feeling which is not bound in the cage of ethics nor in the boundaries defined within its concept.

Happiness is to consider something without looking further at its subsequent by-products. Happiness is what you decide to perceive not what is defined to you to perceive !!!

Happiness !!

To describe the happiness seems to me like to formulate the momentum of the matter, no wonder that Albert Camus defined it as: "You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life. “And not to mention that this mentality was some sort of contagious even within eastern Krishnamurti teachings which is followed by Sohrab Sepehri:
""It is not our business to fathom the mystery of rose, Perhaps our business is to float within the magic of the rose and camp behind the wisdom”
In essence it reminds me of the Chinese proverb emphasizing of the nature to have a personality thus its not surprising to analogize such a concept to Werner Heisenberg theory which indicates that " The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known ".
I'd rather not to go further to relativity and its philosophical relevance to aforementioned concept cause I'm not a physicist!!!

Surrealism and unconsciousness

Surrealism, is it a way bywhich we can explicitly ablolish the intellectual rigidity or is it simply an anthroprogenically defined way of reconciling the intellectual analysis with unconsciousness ?
Dadaism paved the way for this symbiosis I guess, not by its interepretation but instead by providing the first ingredient of such belief. I am not in favor of rejecting the logic . to me there exists an equilibrium between two stances ,with discrepencies in attributes.this equilibrium could be ascribed to an individual while it is usually applied for a group. I consider the individual level. this oppresive logic, which i felt myself , will separate (shift the equilibrium ). then the diametric conflict shows up . moreover, this conflict is remaining till you get rid of the imposing factor. Again I am not supportig the dadaism, rather I am exploring it. thereafter , the unconscious part can not even play the placebo effect . no effect . not at all . the equilibrium has changed . lets look at this way . even if you use your unconsciousness , it functions as if its is another ramification of hyperacute dosage of rationality. the way out is definitely not tending to Anarchy which itself was defined by unconsious rationality. what do you think ?



Hamed

Sin

I sinned a sin full of pleasure,
Next to a shaking, stupefied form.
O God, who knows what I did
In that dark and quiet seclusion

Forugh Farrokhzad

Tranquility

It has been a while that this factor has been replaced in my life with something I am not really aware of ! but I endured it for couple of years . It is definitely not a miniuscule difference but instead like a fact thoroughly encircled any facets of my life , my interactions , my behaviors towards the others and so on that makes every part erratic so far. the first choice , logic ! which clutters everythings ( that might obey their own rules) to set it to OUR arbitrary algorithms ) . and if you get rid of it it becomes perilous . so lets put it off . put it off .

mysterious p53 Protein

the most frequently genetic lesions seen in cancers involves the so-called p53 protein which seems to play the major role in cell cyle. The knock out mice with truncated p53, made by homologous recombination , showed relatively high rate of malignant tumor development . The latter results support the hypothesis that this gene is the main factor predisposing the individuals to cancer development . I 'll try to write more about the connection of this gene which is dispensable for development , with the SIR silencing genes which in abberant form accelarate the progeria . its one of Lenny Guarente preassumptions . whatsmore , the p53 might affect the immune system . I have not found any recent review though .

Arbitrary elixirs

having bound in an arbitrary pre-set rows of definitions , creeping all over you , we are looking for elixirs .nevertheless , we are never aware of using the same pre-set of elixirs used to invigorate ourself like a drug that persists for couple of periods and then triumph for new cure ! lets define new ones ! the rudimentary ones are not working anymore !

hamed