Elixir

hsppiness !!

2008-08-03T20:47:00.001-07:00

I was asked to describe it, not to use the references :
Frankly, I'm almost passing a transition phase where I'm not in touch with what I feel about so called "internal perception ", rather I'm exploring the defined routes of happiness. Happiness to me is like a puzzle : changing according to time and space . what satisfies me at this moment is not adequate to fulfill my further definition of happiness. but lets get it straight " at this moment of time and space , happiness is the Freedom to me " , being free of any arbitrarily accepted format. Spontaneously derived feeling which is not bound in the cage of ethics nor in the boundaries defined within its concept.

Happiness is to consider something without looking further at its subsequent by-products. Happiness is what you decide to perceive not what is defined to you to perceive !!!

Happiness !!

2008-08-03T19:49:00.000-07:00

To describe the happiness seems to me like to formulate the momentum of the matter, no wonder that Albert Camus defined it as: "You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life. “And not to mention that this mentality was some sort of contagious even within eastern Krishnamurti teachings which is followed by Sohrab Sepehri:
""It is not our business to fathom the mystery of rose, Perhaps our business is to float within the magic of the rose and camp behind the wisdom”
In essence it reminds me of the Chinese proverb emphasizing of the nature to have a personality thus its not surprising to analogize such a concept to Werner Heisenberg theory which indicates that " The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known ".
I'd rather not to go further to relativity and its philosophical relevance to aforementioned concept cause I'm not a physicist!!!

Surrealism and unconsciousness

2007-04-02T23:16:00.000-07:00

Surrealism, is it a way bywhich we can explicitly ablolish the intellectual rigidity or is it simply an anthroprogenically defined way of reconciling the intellectual analysis with unconsciousness ?
Dadaism paved the way for this symbiosis I guess, not by its interepretation but instead by providing the first ingredient of such belief. I am not in favor of rejecting the logic . to me there exists an equilibrium between two stances ,with discrepencies in attributes.this equilibrium could be ascribed to an individual while it is usually applied for a group. I consider the individual level. this oppresive logic, which i felt myself , will separate (shift the equilibrium ). then the diametric conflict shows up . moreover, this conflict is remaining till you get rid of the imposing factor. Again I am not supportig the dadaism, rather I am exploring it. thereafter , the unconscious part can not even play the placebo effect . no effect . not at all . the equilibrium has changed . lets look at this way . even if you use your unconsciousness , it functions as if its is another ramification of hyperacute dosage of rationality. the way out is definitely not tending to Anarchy which itself was defined by unconsious rationality. what do you think ?

Hamed

Sin

2007-03-25T20:19:00.000-07:00

I sinned a sin full of pleasure,
Next to a shaking, stupefied form.
O God, who knows what I did
In that dark and quiet seclusion

Forugh Farrokhzad

Tranquility

2007-02-12T20:42:00.000-08:00

It has been a while that this factor has been replaced in my life with something I am not really aware of ! but I endured it for couple of years . It is definitely not a miniuscule difference but instead like a fact thoroughly encircled any facets of my life , my interactions , my behaviors towards the others and so on that makes every part erratic so far. the first choice , logic ! which clutters everythings ( that might obey their own rules) to set it to OUR arbitrary algorithms ) . and if you get rid of it it becomes perilous . so lets put it off . put it off .

mysterious p53 Protein

2007-01-31T23:25:00.000-08:00

the most frequently genetic lesions seen in cancers involves the so-called p53 protein which seems to play the major role in cell cyle. The knock out mice with truncated p53, made by homologous recombination , showed relatively high rate of malignant tumor development . The latter results support the hypothesis that this gene is the main factor predisposing the individuals to cancer development . I 'll try to write more about the connection of this gene which is dispensable for development , with the SIR silencing genes which in abberant form accelarate the progeria . its one of Lenny Guarente preassumptions . whatsmore , the p53 might affect the immune system . I have not found any recent review though .

Arbitrary elixirs

2007-01-29T22:59:00.000-08:00

having bound in an arbitrary pre-set rows of definitions , creeping all over you , we are looking for elixirs .nevertheless , we are never aware of using the same pre-set of elixirs used to invigorate ourself like a drug that persists for couple of periods and then triumph for new cure ! lets define new ones ! the rudimentary ones are not working anymore !

hamed

GOD (?)

2007-01-21T22:55:00.000-08:00

I am the infinite deep
In whom all the worlds appear to rise.
Beyond all form, forever still.
So am I

Ashtavakra Gita

no intellectual analysis please !

2007-01-21T22:28:00.000-08:00

Man cannot come to [truth] through any organization, through any creed, through any dogma, priest or ritual, not through any philosophic knowledge or psychological technique. He has to find it through the mirror of relationship, through the understanding of the contents of his own mind, through observation and not through intellectual analysis or introspective dissection.

-J. Krishnamurti

Stillness ! wanna get out of illusion !

2007-01-19T20:55:00.000-08:00

it might look like quite a bit bazzar but it seems to be true !
what we define as the reality is the reflection of our mind . "The intrusion of our mind power on to raw experience "(1) is happening simaltanously that we are not aware of . the perception has already been contaminated with our infatuations in any kind . we are not oblivious though .
"Although nature commences with reason and ends in experience it is necessary for us to do the opposite, that is to commence with experience and from this to proceed to investigate the reason.” (leonardo davinci )
http://www.life2point0.com/2007/01/dont_just_do_so.html

2007-01-12T23:49:00.000-08:00

Simplicity of character is the natural result of profound thought

I have seen couple of examples recently .believe me !

Gnosticism and Oedipus conflict !

2007-01-07T20:47:00.000-08:00

Last night I found a very intersting article on line which basically focused on a brief comparison among Hafez , Rumi and Sepehri 's Gnostisim . Aside from a complementray explanation of some Sohrab's poem , the comparison between the poems and the oedipus conflict , one of Sigmund Freud's theoris fascinated me. It is inetersting that the writer tried to relate such possible psychological notion to latter poets .
you can reach the article at following link :
http://abbasahmadi.tripod.com/Sepehri01.pdf

Loneliness

2007-01-07T20:24:00.000-08:00

Come ,let me tell you how vast is my loneliness
sohrab sepehri

2007-01-06T21:32:00.000-08:00

To whom it may concern :

you might think that anybody who was able to see "The woman of high rank " or a " Princess " or a beautiful " Goddess " sould be either a preciuos spiritual individual or simply a lucky one !
if you think so , you should put me in the second category

Best regards

2007-01-06T21:13:00.000-08:00

lets fill up partial fractures !
we are all sometimes unaware of all precise set of happenings ,occuring in our life . and we try to condone all the wisdoms . for god's sake lets believe in that so-called wisdom . I am not sure why I am always trying to conceal what I see happening around me that have integrated to tell me just a little fact .it seems to be a good preface . I do not need a preface ! I already knew !
Anyhow , Did I mention how I felt during these routine days ? I have no know ! no answer !
I am not trying to elude to confess what i have noticed . I am just a bit confused with sets of things in row !
I am suprised ! That does'nt make sense .

2007-01-03T20:17:00.000-08:00

If you're calling on me,
approach very gently
lest you crack the delicate
porcelain of my solitude.

Are you conscious ? good for you !

2007-01-03T20:15:00.000-08:00

I was surfing through some of the websites where i found a nice article . what made me fascinated was an example to show how the senses shape the so called reality ( Illusion) . without the mind and the senses nothing can exist as the raelity . so , the reality is like a relative picture of our consiousness . better to say what we call real is just the impression of our senses . lets say we cease our senses , then how do we sense the other dimention ? do we stimulate another sensory parts to sense new form of reality ?

you can find the article here:
http://www.successconsciousness.com

Reality is veiled by illusion !

2006-12-27T00:22:00.000-08:00

I found this really nice but still so ambiguous :
" when you still the mind and the senses, your consciousness seems to shift into a new dimension"

A erratic belief !

2006-12-27T00:05:00.000-08:00

There was the Door to which I found no key;

There was the Veil through which I might not see:

Some little talk awhile of ME and THEE

There was-and then no more of THEE and ME.

OMAR KHAYAM

An erratic belief continues !

2006-12-26T23:44:00.000-08:00

To be or not to be!

That’s not the question but probably the answer!

It might seem conceivable to find out the critical point of being in this current form of being! But the matter is that, we have never thought about this being as the answer, which results in world to be collapsed if it starts to diminish. Unravelling the “being “is the antimatter or better to say the “ant being”. It is still dim to get to that! I hope it’s not going to be a game! Lets pray !

String theory

2006-10-23T19:40:00.000-07:00

I could not even thought that the particles as small as plank's constant with the one dimentional structutre could possibly be the fundamental subatomic particle. whats interesting is that , these particles are the results of abstract mathematics . although there is still a huge controvertial on this issue , the fact is that it helps explaining some phenomena that possibly the so called modern physics was not able to do so . I did a paper on one of the zeno's paradoxes ,and consequently I was wondering if still there is subatomic particles rather than strings cause in this paradox every finite particle is subject to divide in to two !

Ageless Quest

2006-08-26T22:58:00.000-07:00

I was reading the new book I got from Dr. Titorenko . Actually it was really intersting , and I was so fascinated like the time I started reading the science fiction ones . finding the mechanisms of aging as a multifactorial phenomenon is in the center of attention in this book . the way inwhich the book was written makes you feel like you are reading a story which starts up with the fact that there might be some genes controling the varities of reactions or mechanisms which ends up with the senescens of each cell .the story continues with the other queries going on this matter in different labs around the world . the way the Sir2 genes affect the aging process in this fungus is quite a bit different but the fact that the a specific orthologs of this gene in c.elegans or later on in mammalian cells control not exactly the same but more likely similar mechanisms is really interesting . recent researches have shown that this gene also involves in cell apoptosis determination that can also be related to the rate of cancer . anyway I really advise you to take a look at this book .It is worth it !